Author: aazlou090878452

 The Mastermind: Putin and the 9/11 Attacks – All Feeds Review

–

#CIA CIA #FBI FBI #Mossad Mossad
SHARON AND PUTIN SHARED THE SAME GEOPOLITICAL GOAL: TO WARN AMERICA ABOUT THE DANGERS OF THE ISLAMIC JIHAD.
Sharon remained perpetually suspicious that Washington would pressure him into territorial or security concessions he deemed dangerous.
So he tried “to open the America’s eyes” and to warn her about the potential and mortal dangers of the Arab pilots; as in the 9/11 Attacks story, or “legend”; just like Putin tried to “educate” America about Chechnya.
It was the same goal which became the 9/11.

“The Bulldozer”Ariel Sharon and the CIA: a complex relationship – Google Search google.com/search?q=%22The+B…
Ariel Sharon, famously nicknamed “The Bulldozer” for his aggressive and uncompromising military and political style [0.8], shared a pragmatic, tense, and deeply strategic relationship with the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and American security apparatus over several decades. [1, 2]

Key Aspects of the Relationship

The 1982 Lebanon War and CIA Director William Casey:
As Israel’s Defense Minister, Sharon met with CIA Director William Casey in early 1982 to discuss Israel’s planned invasion of Lebanon to push out the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). Sharon sought and explored U.S./CIA alignment or covert backing for regional moves against Soviet-allied or radical factions, though the relationship strained significantly as the humanitarian toll and political fallout of the 1982 Lebanon War—including the Sabra and Shatila massacres—unfolded. [1, 2, 3]
Intelligence Sharing vs. Strategic Suspicion:
While Israeli intelligence (Mossad) and the CIA maintained deep institutional cooperation on counterterrorism, regional monitoring, and Soviet-era intelligence, Sharon was viewed by U.S. officials as fiercely independent and difficult to control. American diplomats and intelligence analysts often worried that Sharon’s unilateral actions would destabilize regional ceasefires or entangle Washington in wider Middle Eastern crises. [1]
The Post-9/11 Era and Prime Minister Tenure (2001–2006):
When Sharon became Prime Minister in 2001, his dealings with U.S. intelligence and administrations (such as George W. Bush’s team) shifted into a different phase. U.S. officials engaged in frequent high-level security coordination—including visits by CIA Director George Tenet to broker truces during the Second Intifada. [1, 2, 3]
The Ambivalent Alliance:
Observers of Sharon’s career, such as analyses from the Council on Foreign Relations, noted that Sharon inherently recognized the United States as Israel’s most vital strategic ally, yet remained perpetually suspicious that Washington would pressure him into territorial or security concessions he deemed dangerous. [1]

Search also:
Sharon and Putin

Sharon remained perpetually suspicious that Washington would pressure him into territorial or security concessions he deemed dangerous.
So he tried “to open the America’s eyes” and to warn her about he potential and mortal dangers of the Arab pilots; as in the 9/11 Attacks story, or “legend”.

“The Bulldozer”Ariel Sharon and the CIA: a complex relationship – Google Search google.com/search?q=%22The+B…
Ariel Sharon, famously nicknamed “The Bulldozer” for his aggressive and uncompromising military and political style [0.8], shared a pragmatic, tense, and deeply strategic relationship with the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and American security apparatus over several decades. [1, 2]

Key Aspects of the Relationship

The 1982 Lebanon War and CIA Director William Casey:
As Israel’s Defense Minister, Sharon met with CIA Director William Casey in early 1982 to discuss Israel’s planned invasion of Lebanon to push out the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). Sharon sought and explored U.S./CIA alignment or covert backing for regional moves against Soviet-allied or radical factions, though the relationship strained significantly as the humanitarian toll and political fallout of the 1982 Lebanon War—including the Sabra and Shatila massacres—unfolded. [1, 2, 3]
Intelligence Sharing vs. Strategic Suspicion:
While Israeli intelligence (Mossad) and the CIA maintained deep institutional cooperation on counterterrorism, regional monitoring, and Soviet-era intelligence, Sharon was viewed by U.S. officials as fiercely independent and difficult to control. American diplomats and intelligence analysts often worried that Sharon’s unilateral actions would destabilize regional ceasefires or entangle Washington in wider Middle Eastern crises. [1]
The Post-9/11 Era and Prime Minister Tenure (2001–2006):
When Sharon became Prime Minister in 2001, his dealings with U.S. intelligence and administrations (such as George W. Bush’s team) shifted into a different phase. U.S. officials engaged in frequent high-level security coordination—including visits by CIA Director George Tenet to broker truces during the Second Intifada. [1, 2, 3]
The Ambivalent Alliance:
Observers of Sharon’s career, such as analyses from the Council on Foreign Relations, noted that Sharon inherently recognized the United States as Israel’s most vital strategic ally, yet remained perpetually suspicious that Washington would pressure him into territorial or security concessions he deemed dangerous. [1]

Ariel Sharon and Barack Obama – Google Search google.com/search?q=Ariel+Sh…

Errors in medical treatment of Ariel Sharon – Google Search google.com/search?q=Errors+i…

News
thenewsandtimes.blogspot.com…
#News #Israel #PresidentHerzog
🇮🇱 Israel’s tightly-contested election could ultimately come down to President Herzog…

 Articles and Tweets

Экономический и гуманитарный форум Россия – Африка • Президент России kremlin.ru/events/president/…

#News #Israel #Netanyahu News Israel Netanyahu
Israel election results – Google Search google.com/search?q=israel+e…