#FBI  #CIA  #ODNI
Review: Conversations with the Gemini – 4.30.25 – 5.1.26 – Criminal vs. Counterintelligence Investigations and other chats  thenewsandtimes.blogspot.com…

— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) May 1, 2026

Review: Conversations with the Gemini – 4.30.25 – 5.1.26 – Criminal vs. Counterintelligence Investigations and other chats  thenewsandtimes.blogspot.com…

— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) May 1, 2026

AI Revolution and the Philosophy of Knowledge – Google Search  google.com/search?num=10&new…
AI Mode:
The AI revolution is not just a technological shift; it is fundamentally altering epistemology—the philosophical study of what knowledge is and how we acquire it. AI challenges traditional definitions by introducing systems that can produce “accurate” results without human-like understanding or belief.1. Can AI “Know” Anything?Traditional philosophy often defines knowledge as justified true belief. AI complicates this by fulfilling some criteria while failing others:Lack of Belief: AI does not “believe” the information it provides; it calculates probabilities based on statistical relationships in data.The Black Box Problem: Many AI systems, particularly deep learning models, are “epistemically opaque.” We may get a correct output (like a medical diagnosis) without a transparent, logical justification for how the system reached it.Artificial Testimony: Some philosophers now view AI outputs as a form of “artificial testimony.” We may not need the AI to be a “knower” to gain knowledge from it, provided the system is a reliably truth-conducive instrument.2. Shifts in Human UnderstandingThe way humans interact with knowledge is moving from possession to collaboration.Coherence vs. Truth: Large language models are designed for plausibility and coherence, not necessarily truth. This can create a “feeling of knowing” that masks a lack of rigorous evaluation.Loss of Serendipity: AI often delivers precise answers directly, stripping away the “information adjacency” (like getting lost in a library or Wikipedia) that fosters context and  creativity.Digital Amnesia: Increased reliance on AI for factual recall may lead to “thinking poor”—where individuals store less information internally and become dependent on external digital tools.3. New Epistemic ResponsibilitiesAs AI mediates our world, philosophers advocate for new intellectual virtues:Epistemological Humility: The need to hold conclusions lightly and continuously question the data and assumptions behind AI-generated “facts”.Glass-Box Epistemology: A call for designing AI with interpretability and value-sensitivity so humans can remain the final arbiters of truth.Epistemic Agency: Maintaining the human capacity to detach from beliefs, reflect on them, and revise them—skills that may be hindered by AI-driven “echo chambers”.Would you like to explore how these philosophical shifts are impacting specific fields like scientific research or educational ethics?

— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) May 1, 2026

AI Revolution and the Philosophy of Knowledge – Google Search  google.com/search?num=10&new…
AI Mode:
AI Revolution and the Philosophy of Knowledge
The AI revolution is not just a technological shift; it is fundamentally altering epistemology—the philosophical study of what knowledge is and how we acquire it. AI challenges traditional definitions by introducing systems that can produce “accurate” results without human-like understanding or belief.1. Can AI “Know” Anything?Traditional philosophy often defines knowledge as justified true belief. AI complicates this by fulfilling some criteria while failing others:Lack of Belief: AI does not “believe” the information it provides; it calculates probabilities based on statistical relationships in data.The Black Box Problem: Many AI systems, particularly deep learning models, are “epistemically opaque.” We may get a correct output (like a medical diagnosis) without a transparent, logical justification for how the system reached it.Artificial Testimony: Some philosophers now view AI outputs as a form of “artificial testimony.” We may not need the AI to be a “knower” to gain knowledge from it, provided the system is a reliably truth-conducive instrument.2. Shifts in Human UnderstandingThe way humans interact with knowledge is moving from possession to collaboration.Coherence vs. Truth: Large language models are designed for plausibility and coherence, not necessarily truth. This can create a “feeling of knowing” that masks a lack of rigorous evaluation.Loss of Serendipity: AI often delivers precise answers directly, stripping away the “information adjacency” (like getting lost in a library or Wikipedia) that fosters context and  creativity.Digital Amnesia: Increased reliance on AI for factual recall may lead to “thinking poor”—where individuals store less information internally and become dependent on external digital tools.3. New Epistemic ResponsibilitiesAs AI mediates our world, philosophers advocate for new intellectual virtues:Epistemological Humility: The need to hold conclusions lightly and continuously question the data and assumptions behind AI-generated “facts”.Glass-Box Epistemology: A call for designing AI with interpretability and value-sensitivity so humans can remain the final arbiters of truth.Epistemic Agency: Maintaining the human capacity to detach from beliefs, reflect on them, and revise them—skills that may be hindered by AI-driven “echo chambers”.Would you like to explore how these philosophical shifts are impacting specific fields like scientific research or educational ethics?

— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) May 1, 2026

Встреча с Президентом Киргизии Садыром Жапаровым • Президент России  kremlin.ru/events/president/…

— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Apr 30, 2026

President Japarov vs his former Kyrgyz security chief Tashiyev – Google Search  google.com/search?q=Presiden…
–
x.com/thetimesoca/status/204…
–
AI Mode:
The longtime political partnership between Kyrgyz President Sadyr Japarov and his former security chief, Kamchybek Tashiyev, has dramatically collapsed, culminating in Tashiyev being formally charged with a coup attempt as of April 30, 2026. [1, 2]
The Collapse of the “Two Friends” (Eki Dos)
For over five years, Japarov and Tashiyev were seen as an inseparable duo—often called the eki dos (two friends)—who jointly controlled Kyrgyzstan’s political and security landscape. [1, 3, 4]

Abrupt Dismissal: On February 10, 2026, Japarov unexpectedly fired Tashiyev from his post as head of the State Committee for National Security (GKNB) while Tashiyev was in Germany for medical treatment.
Official Reason: Japarov framed the move as necessary to “strengthen unity” and prevent divisions within the state.
Underlying Tensions: Analysts suggest the rift grew as Tashiyev’s influence expanded to rival the president’s, creating a “duumvirate” that Japarov eventually decided to dismantle to consolidate power ahead of the January 2027 presidential election. [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]

Current Legal Status of Tashiyev
Following his dismissal, the Kyrgyz government has systematically targeted Tashiyev’s network through a series of criminal investigations:

Severe Charges: As of April 30, 2026, Tashiyev has been charged with violently attempting to seize power (Article 326) and abuse of office (Article 337).
The Purge: Authorities have arrested his brother, Shairbek Tashiyev, on corruption charges related to oil resale. Other family members and close associates, including his son, have been questioned as “witnesses”.
Restrictions: While not yet detained as of April 30, Tashiyev has been ordered not to leave the town and has confirmed the existence of the criminal case against him. [1, 6, 11, 12]

Broader Impact on Kyrgyzstan
This split marks a significant shift in Kyrgyz politics: [13, 14]

Institutional Reshuffle: Japarov has restructured the security bloc, bringing formerly autonomous units like the Border Service and National Guard under direct presidential control.
Political Uncertainty: The fall of the tandem has disrupted the narrative of stability that the duo promoted. While Japarov remains firmly in control, the move has raised questions about whether this will lead to further elite competition or a more centralized authoritarian system. [10, 15, 16, 17]

Would you like more details on the specific corruption allegations involving Tashiyev’s family or the security sector reforms Japarov implemented after the split?

[1]  thediplomat.com
[2]  occrp.org
[3]  globalvoices.org
[4]  caspianpost.com
[5]  thediplomat.com
[6]  thediplomat.com
[7]  rferl.org
[8]  occrp.org
[9]  linkedin.com
[10]  caspianpost.com
[11]  reuters.com
[12]  tribunecontentagency.com
[13]  thediplomat.com
[14]  caspianpost.com
[15]  caspianpost.com
[16]  thediplomat.com
[17]  thediplomat.comThe Times of Central Asia (@thetimesoca)Tashiyev, former Kyrgyz security chief, has been charged with abuse of power and attempted seizure of authority as tensions deepen between President Japarov and his former ally, highlighting an escalating elite rift.
timesca.com/tashiyev-charged…—  https://x.com/thetimesoca/status/2049893056078331970

— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Apr 30, 2026

42 years together: Proof that true love only gets better with time pic.twitter.com/uQCG5ZCUh7

— Seth (@fiercepatricks) April 30, 2026

Tashiyev, former Kyrgyz security chief, has been charged with abuse of power and attempted seizure of authority as tensions deepen between President Japarov and his former ally, highlighting an escalating elite rift.https://t.co/6WZhcfVsQ5

— The Times of Central Asia (@thetimesoca) April 30, 2026

share.google/aimode/zM4cTrCX…
musk and ai – AI Mode
Elon Musk is currently at the center of a massive legal and commercial battle over the future of artificial intelligence. As of April 30, 2026, he is testifying in a landmark trial against OpenAI and its CEO Sam Altman, accusing them of “looting a charity” by shifting from a nonprofit mission to a for-profit “money-making machine”. [1, 2, 3, 4]

Elon Musk’s new AI company xAI – what we know so far
Elon Musk’s AI chatbot Grok sounds off on its creator – Los …
Elon Musk Unveils Giant AI Training Chip Center

Watch these reports for detailed breakdowns of the courtroom clash and Musk’s testimony regarding AI safety and competition:

Elon Musk testifies at OpenAI trial, YouTube · NBC News · 1970 M01 1
Elon Musk vs. OpenAI: Testy exchanges fill day 2 of trial, YouTube · CNN · 1970 M01 1
Elon Musk testifies in landmark trial against OpenAI’s Sam …, YouTube · LiveNOW from FOX · 1970 M01 1
Musk vs OpenAI: The trial over who controls AI | DW News, YouTube · DW News · 1970 M01 1
The OpenAI Lawsuit

The Allegation: Musk, an original co-founder who donated roughly $38 million to the nonprofit, claims he was “deceived” and that the founders breached their charitable trust.

The Defense: OpenAI argues that Musk’s suit is motivated by “jealousy and regret” because he failed to gain full control of the company before leaving in 2018.
High Stakes: Musk is seeking $130 billion in damages and the removal of Altman from the board. A win for Musk could derail OpenAI’s plans to go public later this year. [3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]
Strategic Moves with xAI and SpaceX [11, 12]

While suing a rival, Musk is rapidly building his own AI ecosystem: [13, 14, 15]
Vertical Integration: Musk recently merged his AI startup, xAI, into SpaceX, creating a combined entity valued at approximately $1.25 trillion.

Expansion into AI Coding: SpaceX secured an option to acquire the AI coding startup Cursor for $60 billion, aiming to dominate the developer tools market.
Computing Power: Musk is utilizing the Colossus supercomputer—a cluster equivalent to 1 million GPUs—to train advanced models and scale up xAI’s capabilities. [9, 12]
Vision for the Future

Universal High Income: Musk predicts that AI will eventually eliminate all traditional jobs, leading to a “post-scarcity” civilization where humans receive a “universal high income” rather than just a basic one.

End of Scarcity: He argues that robots and AI will provide goods and services at near-zero marginal cost, potentially making traditional savings and retirement funds irrelevant.
Extreme Concerns: Despite his optimism, Musk testified that he remains deeply concerned about AI safety, warning that untrustworthy leadership in AI is “dangerous to the whole world”. [16, 17, 18, 19, 20]
Are you interested in more details about the OpenAI trial testimony or the upcoming SpaceX IPO?

[1]  youtube.com

[2]  nytimes.com
[3]  theconversation.com
[4]  creators.yahoo.com
[5]  cnn.com
[6]  youtube.com
[7]  youtube.com
[8]  reuters.com
[9]  technologyreview.com
[10]  cbsnews.com
[11]  bbc.com
[12]  instagram.com
[13]  businessinsider.com
[14]  dailymotion.com
[15]  klover.ai
[16]  weforum.org
[17]  facebook.com
[18]  finance.yahoo.com
[19]  axios.com
[20]  theatlantic.com

— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Apr 30, 2026