Categories
South Caucasus News

OSCE/ODIHR Election Observation Mission Interim Report


Listen to this article

The OSCE/ODIHR Election Observation Mission (EOM) issued its interim report on October 11, assessing the election environment and related developments in the run-up to October 26 parliamentary elections. According to the report “the elections take place in the context of entrenched political polarization, continued political tension, opposition distrust in state institutions and concerns about protection of the right to association and expression.”

The report notes the “highly polarized” rhetoric of the campaign messaging, with some ODIHR EOM interlocutors raising concerns “related to intimidation tactics allegedly directed against their campaign activities, as well as voters, by ruling party supporters and sate authorities.”

The report also notes that “the ruling party has framed the elections as a choice between peace and war, while most opposition parties present the elections as a referendum on country’s geopolitical position.”

While many of the ODIHR EOM interlocutors expressed trust in the election administration’s technical and organizational capacities, says the report, “some interlocutors raised concerns that the simplified decision-making process of the CEC, the removal of the opposition-appointed deputy chairperson and the new appointment method of its members, could negatively impact the impartiality of the election administration.”

The report notes that since the since the last parliamentary elections, the Election Code has been amended over 20 times. And while the 2022 and 2023 amendments followed public discussions and addressed several previous ODIHR recommendations (although failing to provide the comprehensive reform) the 2024 changes were adopted without sufficient public consultation or consensus, and raised concerns about their impact. The report notes also that several ODIHR recommendations remain outstanding, “including those related to impartiality of election administration, misuse of administrative resources, campaign and campaign finance, media-related campaign regulations, and strengthening the framework for electoral dispute resolution.”

Among other issues, the report mentions concerns by some stakeholders about the capacity of the Precint Eleciton Commissions (PECs) to manage the increased number of registered voters per polling station, which has doubled since the last elections. Another related concern is “the need for further transparent auditing of the technology, and voter education to address misconceptions that the devices may be used to breach vote secrecy.”

Another issue mentioned in the report is the voters’ list. Most ODIHR EOM interlocutors did not raise significant concerns about the inclusiveness of the voter lists, the report says, but “some noted inaccuracies mainly stemming from the potential presence of deceased voters and citizens de facto residing abroad on the list.”

According to the report, the election administration and the courts have so far received some 120 complaints, mainly concerning the appointment of lower-level members of the election commission, the misuse of administrative resources and violations of campaign rules. Most of the complaints were dismissed after being examined on their substance. The report notes that “several ODIHR EOM interlocutors noted a low level of trust in the ability of law-enforcement, the election administration and the judiciary to effectively and impartially examine and adjudicate politically sensitive matters.”

Regarding the observer organizations, the report states that as of October 10, the CEC had accredited 68 civil observer organizations with 2,602 observers and 51 international observer groups with 512 observers.  It is noted that several CSOs have started long-term observation activities, and “many noted a more difficult working environment due to their public stigmatization following the adoption of the Law on Transparency of Foreign Influence.”

The report notes that the women’s representation in elected positions remains low, noting in particular the 2024 amendments that abolished the mandatory gender quota.

Also Read: