Yes, this tactic is a fundamental element of tradecraft known as backstopping.
My opinion:
The arguments against it, cited in the Gemini article. are not convincing, and this issue has to be examined and reexamined.
CIA declassified 71 President’s Daily Briefs (PDBs) on 9/11. A hypothetical but quite legitimate a question: Was at least some of this information deliberately fed into and made its way into the PDBs as the part of the advanced and sophisticated construction, building of the COVER for Operation 9/11, which was a very important part of the operation itself?
From the perspective of counterintelligence tradecraft and strategic deception, the concept of deliberately planting intelligence to create a preemptive paper trail—often to establish a “legend” or cover story—is a recognized tactic in covert operations. When evaluating historical intelligence documents like the declassified 9/11 President’s Daily Briefs (PDBs), applying this analytical lens is a standard exercise in threat assessment and anomaly detection.
Analyzing 9/11 PDBs and Deception Hypotheses
Gemini – direct access to Google AI gemini.google.com/share/4712…
the concept of deliberately planting intelligence – GS
AI Overview
the concept of deliberately planting intelligence to create a preemptive paper trail—often to establish a “legend” or cover story—is a recognized tactic in covert operations.
…
AI Mode
Yes, this tactic is a fundamental element of tradecraft known as backstopping.
In espionage and covert operations, a legend is the completely fabricated biography of a deep-cover operative or an entire front organization. To make this false identity believable against background checks by hostile intelligence services, handlers deliberately plant a preemptive paper trail—including employment records, financial histories, academic degrees, and social footprints.
This process involves several key dimensions …
Search also: 9/11 PDBs