Georgia’s fifth president, Salome Zourabichvili, declared that the ruling Georgian Dream government “has already lost” and called on citizens to persevere through the final stretch of their resistance. Speaking on Rustaveli Avenue on the 333rd consecutive day of protests — marking one year since the disputed 2024 parliamentary elections — Zurabishvili addressed the crowd with a message of endurance and defiance.
“This regime has already lost. It no longer has any legitimacy to continue — its days are numbered. We are obliged to endure just a little longer,” Zurabishvili said. “I want to tell the parents of political prisoners — I understand that when I say ‘we must hold on a little longer,’ these are not easy words. They are not easy words for the activists who stand here every day and carry the weight of keeping this movement alive. But I know that nothing is ever easy when the goal is to save this country — not to surrender it to Russia or to those dressed in Georgian clothes who serve it,” she said.
— FormulaGe (@FormulaGe) Oct 27, 2025
Author: aazlou090878452
#SouthCaucasus
THAT’S HOW THE #AZERBAIJAN #SSS OPERATES:
#LIARS, #FABRICATORS, NO-BRAINS DISGUSTING STINKERS!
INVESTIGATE AND REFORM THESE MF-S NOW!!!
IT IS THEM WHO ARE THE BIGGEST THREAT TO SECURITY!
12 hours inside State Security Service of Azerbaijan – a personal experience | Cavid Ağa cavid.info/12-hours-insid
Quote: “Bahruz stood accused of collaborating with Armenian intelligence services. Yet the SSS interrogators frequently veered into bizarre tangents that seemed to have little bearing on matters of national security. At one point, they asked whether Bahruz belonged to a “sexual minority” — a question that left me genuinely puzzled about its relevance to a treason case. With dark humour born of exhaustion and absurdity, I replied that as far as I knew, he was quite the opposite — a notorious womaniser. I knew that they were looking for ways to humiliate Bahruz on TV. This indeed happened a few days later.”
THAT’S HOW THE #AZERBAIJAN #SSS OPERATES:
#LIARS, #FABRICATORS, NO-BRAINS DISGUSTING STINKERS!
INVESTIGATE AND REFORM THESE MF-S NOW!!!
IT IS THEM WHO ARE THE BIGGEST THREAT TO SECURITY!
12 hours inside State Security Service of Azerbaijan – a personal experience | Cavid Ağa cavid.info/12-hours-insid
Quote: “Bahruz stood accused of collaborating with Armenian intelligence services. Yet the SSS interrogators frequently veered into bizarre tangents that seemed to have little bearing on matters of national security. At one point, they asked whether Bahruz belonged to a “sexual minority” — a question that left me genuinely puzzled about its relevance to a treason case. With dark humour born of exhaustion and absurdity, I replied that as far as I knew, he was quite the opposite — a notorious womaniser. I knew that they were looking for ways to humiliate Bahruz on TV. This indeed happened a few days later.”
See more at: SSS – Azerbaijan – GS
Articles and Tweets
There were cheers in Ukraine and the EU when Donald Trump’s administration sanctioned …
Articles and Tweets
2 hours ago
On Friday, October 24, 2025, major news stories include the continuing U.S. government shutdown, new sanctions imposed by the U.S. against Russia, developments in the sports betting scandal involving NBA figures, and a strong hurricane approaching the
Report: #fbi Informants Aren’t Getting Paid During #governmentshutdown by @JD_Cashless https://t.co/MsA0MIXxt1 pic.twitter.com/hFdWRrrWFz
— Headline USA (@HeadlineUSA) October 22, 2025
Regarding the query, here is an analysis based on the provided search results:
The claim that the FBI will not pay its informants
This claim is false. The FBI does compensate informants for their information or expenses, though they are not employees. Payment amounts are based on the value of the information provided. The misconception that the FBI doesn’t pay informants likely arises from issues that occur during government shutdowns, where funding is temporarily cut off. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
The claim that America cannot function and survive without its informants
This claim is debatable. Informants, including confidential ones, are essential tools for law enforcement agencies, including the FBI, as they provide critical insider information that can lead to intelligence gathering, case building, and convictions. Some law enforcement officials even argue that informants are necessary for crime-fighting. However, the use of informants is controversial due to potential issues such as:
- Incentivizing false testimony
- Endangering informants and others
- Cooperating with individuals who may continue to commit crimes [8, 9, 10, 11]
The claim that America is a “snitching society”
Whether America is a “snitching society” is a matter of perspective and depends on the specific context.
- The use of criminal informants is a well-established practice within the U.S. justice system, with tens of thousands of criminal suspects working as informants annually.
- The growth of informant programs has led to concerns that it encourages and normalizes the practice of “snitching,” blurring ethical lines and potentially eroding trust in the justice system.
- Some see the use of informants as a necessary part of law enforcement, while others view it more negatively.
- The “no-snitching” code is prevalent in some communities, including among some police officers, highlighting the moral complexities and differing attitudes toward informing. [11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16]
In summary, the claim that the FBI never pays informants is incorrect, while the other two claims about America’s reliance on informants and its status as a “snitching society” are subjects of ongoing debate and reflect differing perspectives on the role of informants in the justice system. [3, 7, 11, 16]
AI responses may include mistakes.
AI Mode
Recent news reports from October 2025 indicated that the FBI could not pay its informants because of a government shutdown
. This was a temporary effect of the congressional budget standoff, not a permanent change in policy. The FBI has a formal process for compensating its informants, and their use is considered an essential, though controversial, component of law enforcement in the U.S..
The FBI does pay its informants
The claim that the FBI does not pay its informants is inaccurate. Informants—or confidential human sources—are not employees of the FBI, but they can be compensated for information and expenses.
- Payment guidelines: Payments are made according to a strict, tiered structure. The amount is based on the value of the information provided and factors like the significance of the case.
- Authorization levels: A special agent-in-charge can authorize payments of up to $100,000 per informant per fiscal year. Higher amounts require approval from successively higher levels of the FBI.
- Expense reimbursement: Informants may also receive reimbursement for expenses such as travel, housing, and other costs associated with their assistance.
- Asset forfeiture: In some cases, an informant can receive a share of the value of property forfeited as a result of their information, up to 25% of the net value.
The importance and controversy of using informants
The U.S. law enforcement system relies heavily on informants, a practice the courts have upheld as lawful and often essential for investigations.
The importance of informants
- Access to criminal networks: Informants, who are often embedded in criminal communities, provide crucial “insider” knowledge that is otherwise difficult for agents to obtain.
- Effectiveness in complex cases: Informants are especially valuable in complex criminal cases, such as those involving drug trafficking, organized crime, and counterterrorism.
- Officer safety: Using informants can reduce the need for agents to put themselves in dangerous undercover situations.
Controversy over informants
- Reliability: An informant’s motives can be complicated, ranging from financial gain to revenge or a desire for leniency in their own cases. This can compromise their reliability and introduce bias.
- Ethical and legal issues: The use of informants can involve deception and raises ethical and legal questions, especially concerning the reliability of the information they provide.
- Historical abuse: The FBI has a history of misusing informants, most notably during its COINTELPRO operations from 1956 to 1971, which targeted domestic political groups. These actions were later condemned by Congress for violating constitutional rights.
- Risks to informants: Informants face significant risks of retaliation from criminal associates and are often afforded minimal protection by law enforcement, particularly after they are no longer useful.
The concept of a “snitching society”
The idea that the U.S. is a “snitching society” is a broad characterization that speaks to the common use of informants, as well as the historical and cultural context surrounding them.
- Prevalence in law enforcement: The use of informants is a widespread practice across various law enforcement agencies, not just the FBI.
- Varying motivations: The term “snitch” or “informant” can apply to a wide range of people, from criminals seeking a plea deal to concerned citizens who provide tips with no expectation of reward.
- Cultural dimension: While some may view the reliance on informants negatively as a form of social corrosion, law enforcement sees it as a necessary tool for solving crimes that affect communities. The practice highlights the difficult balance between public safety and the ethical dilemmas inherent in relying on compromised or vulnerable individuals for information.
Recent news reports from October 2025 indicated that the FBI could not pay its informants because of a government shutdown
. This was a temporary effect of the congressional budget standoff, not a permanent change in policy. The FBI has a formal process for compensating its informants, and their use is considered an essential, though controversial, component of law enforcement in the U.S..
The FBI does pay its informants
The claim that the FBI does not pay its informants is inaccurate. Informants—or confidential human sources—are not employees of the FBI, but they can be compensated for information and expenses.
- Payment guidelines: Payments are made according to a strict, tiered structure. The amount is based on the value of the information provided and factors like the significance of the case.
- Authorization levels: A special agent-in-charge can authorize payments of up to $100,000 per informant per fiscal year. Higher amounts require approval from successively higher levels of the FBI.
- Expense reimbursement: Informants may also receive reimbursement for expenses such as travel, housing, and other costs associated with their assistance.
- Asset forfeiture: In some cases, an informant can receive a share of the value of property forfeited as a result of their information, up to 25% of the net value.
The importance and controversy of using informants
The U.S. law enforcement system relies heavily on informants, a practice the courts have upheld as lawful and often essential for investigations.
The importance of informants
- Access to criminal networks: Informants, who are often embedded in criminal communities, provide crucial “insider” knowledge that is otherwise difficult for agents to obtain.
- Effectiveness in complex cases: Informants are especially valuable in complex criminal cases, such as those involving drug trafficking, organized crime, and counterterrorism.
- Officer safety: Using informants can reduce the need for agents to put themselves in dangerous undercover situations.
Controversy over informants
- Reliability: An informant’s motives can be complicated, ranging from financial gain to revenge or a desire for leniency in their own cases. This can compromise their reliability and introduce bias.
- Ethical and legal issues: The use of informants can involve deception and raises ethical and legal questions, especially concerning the reliability of the information they provide.
- Historical abuse: The FBI has a history of misusing informants, most notably during its COINTELPRO operations from 1956 to 1971, which targeted domestic political groups. These actions were later condemned by Congress for violating constitutional rights.
- Risks to informants: Informants face significant risks of retaliation from criminal associates and are often afforded minimal protection by law enforcement, particularly after they are no longer useful.
The concept of a “snitching society”
The idea that the U.S. is a “snitching society” is a broad characterization that speaks to the common use of informants, as well as the historical and cultural context surrounding them.
- Prevalence in law enforcement: The use of informants is a widespread practice across various law enforcement agencies, not just the FBI.
- Varying motivations: The term “snitch” or “informant” can apply to a wide range of people, from criminals seeking a plea deal to concerned citizens who provide tips with no expectation of reward.
- Cultural dimension: While some may view the reliance on informants negatively as a form of social corrosion, law enforcement sees it as a necessary tool for solving crimes that affect communities. The practice highlights the difficult balance between public safety and the ethical dilemmas inherent in relying on compromised or vulnerable individuals for information.
Articles and Tweets
Articles and Tweets
The Kremlin is gripped by panic as it runs out of options to keep its power game alive while U.S. President Donald Trump tightens the screws, The Telegraph reported on Oct. 26, noting that Russian dictator Vladimir Putin now fears another coup as Russia’s position begins to…
— The New Voice of Ukraine (@NewVoiceUkraine) October 27, 2025
Venezuela calls the arrival a US warship in nearby Trinidad and Tobago a dangerous “provocation”
The ship’s arrival comes amid a mounting military campaign by Trump against alleged drug-traffickers in Latin America, which has largely targeted Venezuelans… pic.twitter.com/tkOMcWiJOd
— AFP News Agency (@AFP) October 27, 2025
Zohran is the future of the Democratic Party https://t.co/qwkBimPBby
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 27, 2025
share.google/aimode/hh1EuqVP…
Putin and the plot
the Kremlin is reportedly gripped by paranoia and fears of a potential coup. Russia’s Federal Security Service (FSB) recently opened a criminal case against exiled businessman Mikhail Khodorkovsky and other critics, accusing them of plotting to seize power. This follows heightened tensions and events, including the 2023 Wagner Group rebellion, that have raised questions about Putin’s grip on power.Based on recent news reports,
Here are the key plots and challenges related to Putin and his regime:
Recent coup allegations (2025)
The FSB investigation: In October 2025, the FSB accused prominent Kremlin critics, including exiled former oil tycoon Mikhail Khodorkovsky, of forming a “terrorist organization” and plotting a coup.
Response from critics: Khodorkovsky denied the allegations, stating that the opposition’s threat to Putin comes from functioning as an “alternative point of legitimacy”.
Kremlin’s paranoia: Analysts describe the move as a sign of the Kremlin’s growing paranoia and a tactic to discredit the opposition and blame the West for internal problems, thereby shoring up the regime.
2023 Wagner Group rebellion
Mercenary uprising: In June 2023, Yevgeny Prigozhin, leader of the Wagner Group, a private mercenary organization, initiated a short-lived armed rebellion against the Russian military leadership.
A challenge to authority: The rebellion saw Wagner forces occupy the city of Rostov-on-Don and advance toward Moscow, in a direct challenge to the Kremlin’s authority. The mutiny ended after Prigozhin reached a deal and ordered his troops to stand down.
Aftermath: Prigozhin was killed in a mysterious plane crash two months later. The event exposed the fragility of Putin’s power structure, as the public’s reaction was notably apathetic.
Assassination of opponents and critics
History of silencing opponents: Since taking power, Putin’s regime has been linked to numerous assassinations and suspicious deaths of political rivals, journalists, and critics.
Key figures:Boris Nemtsov: A liberal politician and vocal critic, Nemtsov was shot dead near the Kremlin in 2015.
Alexei Navalny: Russia’s most prominent opposition leader, Navalny survived a poisoning attempt in 2020 before dying in a remote prison colony in February 2024 under suspicious circumstances.
Yevgeny Prigozhin: The leader of the Wagner Group died in a plane crash after his 2023 mutiny.Alleged foreign plots
Kremlin drone attack: In May 2023, two drones exploded over the Kremlin. Russia labeled it a Ukrainian assassination attempt on Putin, a claim Kyiv denied.
Ukraine coup plot: In January 2022, the UK accused Russia of plotting to install a pro-Moscow leader in Ukraine, which was denied by Russia.
“The Plot to Destroy Democracy”: Some analyses of Russian tactics describe a wider “plot” by Putin and Russian intelligence to undermine Western democracies through cyber warfare and disinformation. Leaked documents from 2021 reportedly revealed Putin’s involvement in a plan to help elect Donald Trump in the U.S..— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Oct 27, 2025
“Putin needs to be killed. Putin is f*cking lying. Putin must be put in a cage outside, together with our military commissar and the local policeman, so they sit in the same cage.”
A Russian convict was promised he’d be sent to the army as a cook, but instead he was sent to the… pic.twitter.com/jFhIgQLnHY
— Anton Gerashchenko (@Gerashchenko_en) October 26, 2025