Categories
South Caucasus News

Why extreme weather is redefining global risk planning


Extreme weather is no longer viewed as a series of isolated natural events, News.Az reports.
It has become a structural factor shaping economic planning public policy security assessments and social resilience worldwide. Floods heatwaves droughts storms and wildfires increasingly occur with greater intensity frequency and geographic reach. Understanding why extreme weather now carries permanent global significance requires examining systemic drivers impacts across sectors and the long term adjustments societies must undertake.
From rare events to recurring patterns Historically extreme weather was treated as exceptional. Planning assumptions relied on averages and historical norms. Today those assumptions no longer hold. Communities experience repeated shocks within short timeframes eroding recovery capacity. What was once described as unusual is becoming statistically expected. This shift changes how risk must be measured insured and governed.
Climate dynamics and system feedbacks Extreme weather emerges from interacting climate systems rather than single causes. Rising temperatures alter atmospheric circulation ocean currents and moisture distribution. These changes reinforce one another through feedback loops. For example warmer air holds more moisture intensifying rainfall while higher sea temperatures fuel stronger storms. Such dynamics increase volatility across multiple regions simultaneously.
Economic exposure and cascading losses The economic cost of extreme weather extends beyond immediate damage. Disrupted supply chains production delays infrastructure repair and lost productivity accumulate over time. Agriculture energy transportation and manufacturing all face heightened exposure. When major production hubs are affected ripple effects spread through global markets influencing prices availability and inflation expectations.
Insurance markets under pressure Insurance systems are designed to spread risk over time and geography. Repeated extreme weather events strain this model. Premiums rise coverage contracts and some regions become uninsurable. These trends transfer risk from private insurers to households governments and financial systems. Insurance availability increasingly influences where people live invest and build.
Urban vulnerability and infrastructure limits Urbanization amplifies weather related risk. Dense populations aging infrastructure and impermeable surfaces increase exposure to floods heat and storms. Many cities were not designed for current climate conditions. Retrofitting drainage cooling systems and transport networks requires large investment and long planning horizons.
Public health consequences Extreme weather directly affects public health. Heatwaves increase mortality among vulnerable populations. Floods contaminate water supplies and spread disease. Wildfire smoke degrades air quality over large areas. Health systems must adapt to surges in demand while managing chronic impacts that persist long after events subside.
Food security and water stress Agricultural systems depend on stable climate patterns. Extreme heat drought and unpredictable rainfall reduce yields and increase volatility. Water stress intensifies competition between agriculture industry and households. Food security concerns are no longer confined to traditionally vulnerable regions. Globalized food markets transmit local shocks worldwide.
Energy systems and reliability challenges Energy infrastructure faces growing stress from extreme weather. Heat increases electricity demand while reducing generation efficiency. Storms damage transmission networks. Drought limits hydropower output. Reliable energy supply becomes harder to guarantee precisely when demand is highest. This mismatch challenges both traditional and renewable systems.
Migration and social pressure As living conditions deteriorate in affected regions populations may relocate temporarily or permanently. Weather driven migration places pressure on receiving areas influencing housing labor markets and public services. Social cohesion can be tested when displacement occurs at scale. Managing migration requires proactive planning rather than reactive response.
Security implications and governance stress Extreme weather can exacerbate existing political and social tensions. Resource scarcity economic disruption and displacement increase the risk of instability. Governments face higher demands for disaster response while managing fiscal constraints. Effective governance becomes critical to maintaining trust during repeated crises.
Technology and early warning systems Advances in forecasting monitoring and communication improve early warning capabilities. Data driven models help anticipate risks and guide evacuation or adaptation measures. However technology alone cannot eliminate vulnerability. Its effectiveness depends on institutional capacity public trust and equitable access to information.
Adaptation as a strategic priority Mitigation efforts aim to address underlying causes but adaptation is increasingly unavoidable. Adaptation includes resilient infrastructure diversified agriculture water management and heat tolerant urban design. Strategic adaptation recognizes that some level of extreme weather is now locked into the system regardless of future emissions pathways.
Financing resilience and adaptation gaps Funding adaptation remains a challenge. Benefits are long term and diffuse while costs are immediate. Public budgets private investment and international finance mechanisms must align to close gaps. Without adequate financing adaptation efforts risk lagging behind accelerating impacts.
Why extreme weather reshapes global planning Extreme weather forces a reevaluation of how risk is understood and managed. It affects defense planning corporate strategy urban development and international cooperation. Decision makers increasingly integrate climate risk into models that once focused solely on economic or geopolitical variables.
Long horizon impacts on development Development trajectories are influenced by exposure to extreme weather. Countries with limited resources face compounded challenges as repeated shocks divert funds from education health and growth. Inequality between regions may widen unless resilience building becomes central to development strategy.
Conclusion and forward outlook Extreme weather has moved from the margins of planning to its center. It is a persistent driver of risk that intersects with every major policy domain. Societies that recognize this shift and invest in resilience adaptation and governance capacity will be better positioned to navigate uncertainty. The question is no longer whether extreme weather will shape the future but how prepared the world is to live with it.


Categories
South Caucasus News

Vuori’s Best Cold-Weather Gear is On Sale, Just In Time for the Snowstorm


Vuori’s Best Cold-Weather Gear is On Sale, Just In Time for the Snowstorm

Deals include the editor-tested Sunday joggers…
Read More


Categories
South Caucasus News

The Best Cardigans for Men, Tested by Style Experts


The Best Cardigans for Men, Tested by Style Experts

Abercombie and Uniqlo offer some of the sharpest options…
Read More


Categories
South Caucasus News

3 Cheap Ultrawide Monitors Actually Worth Buying


3 Cheap Ultrawide Monitors Actually Worth Buying

Ultrawide monitors are great, but they can be expensive. Fortunately, we found a few inexpensive options that will deliver a quality viewing experience…
Read More


Categories
South Caucasus News

Kia Is Coming Out With Its Cheapest EV Yet


Kia Is Coming Out With Its Cheapest EV Yet

Kia has unveiled its new EV2 hatchback, which is stylish, tech-forward, and affordable. But for many consumers, this vehicle will remain out of reach…
Read More


Categories
South Caucasus News

Azerbaijan Promises More Gas to Europe as Production Reality Lags


Azerbaijan Promises More Gas to Europe as Production Reality Lags

Eurasianet

Eurasianet

Eurasianet is an independent news organization that covers news from and about the South Caucasus and Central Asia, providing on-the-ground reporting and critical perspectives on…

More Info

Set us as your preferred Google source

Premium Content

By Eurasianet – Jan 23, 2026, 1:00 PM CST

  • New SOCAR supply deals with Austria and Germany lack transparency on volumes and may represent rerouted gas rather than additional EU exports.
  • Recent production data and stalled upstream investment cast doubt on Azerbaijan’s ability to reach its pledged 20 bcm annual gas exports to the EU.
  • Pipeline constraints across the Southern Gas Corridor remain a major bottleneck, with no clear commitments to expand capacity to promised levels.
Pipeline

The Azerbaijani state energy company SOCAR has announced it is selling natural gas to Austria and Germany. But it remains an open question whether Baku can hit its promised target of delivering 20 billion cubic meters (bcm) of gas to the European Union in the near future.

Azerbaijani leader Ilham Aliyev, speaking on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum in Davos, said the new export arrangements bring to 16 the number of countries Azerbaijan supplies with gas, 10 of which are EU members.

Yet the announcement sheds little light on whether Baku remains on track to meet its 2022 commitment to double gas exports to the EU within the next few years to 20 bcm. The original target for fulfillment was 2027, though Azerbaijan has already rolled back on that date.

SOCAR released few details about the supply deals with Austria and Germany: it is uncertain, then, if Baku is increasing EU-bound gas exports or merely redirecting gas already being exported to new buyers. The company has stated only that deliveries will be made via the Trans Adriatic Pipeline (TAP), the westernmost section of the Southern Gas Corridor that carries Azerbaijani gas to Europe.

The Austrian/German supplies may be linked to a recent announcement by the TAP operating company that it expanded pipeline capacity by 1.2 bcm per year, starting this January. Similarly, the exports to Germany may be part of a deal with SEFE, a state-owned German energy entity, announced in mid-2025. Under the terms of that deal, SOCAR is supposed to supply up to 1.5 bcm per year for 10 years.

Neither SOCAR, SEFE, nor TAP have confirmed details of SOCAR’s new exports, while Baku has also been silent on the identity of the Austrian importer and the volume it will import.

This lack of transparency from Baku seems par for the course. The past year has seen a marked reduction in the amount and quality of energy news and data released by both Azerbaijan government agencies and energy companies operating there.

Azerbaijan’s Energy Ministry used to release regular monthly bulletins on oil & gas production and exports. But since April 2025 only three bulletins have been issued.
The most recent data, released January 12, shows that Azerbaijan’s overall annual gas production in 2025 was 51.5 bcm, up just 2.4 percent on 2024’s total, and a far lower rate of growth than needed if Baku hopes to significantly expand exports to Europe. Azerbaijani exports to the EU actually declined slightly in 2025, totaling 12.8 bcm, a 1 percent drop over the previous year’s volume.

The most recent data raises concerns that Azerbaijan will not only have trouble meeting its EU commitment but also have enough gas to meet fast-growing domestic demand.

Most of Azerbaijan’s gas exports come from one field, the BP-operated Shah Deniz, production from which is currently being expanded via a second phase of development. However, BP has never confirmed the anticipated expanded rate of Shah Deniz production or disclosed how much gas it expects to produce from the deep gas reserves identified below its ACG oil field. Less than 18 months ago the company was happily trumpeting the ACG discovery, and less than three months ago confirming it expects production to start during the first half of 2026.

The only operator offering clearer targets has been TotalEnergies, whose Absheron field produced 1.6 bcm in 2025. A second phase of Absheron development is planned that could raise annual production to 6 bcm, if TotalEnergies agrees to make the necessary investment. To date an investment decision has not been announced.

The uncertainty about timelines has not stopped Baku from promising a large part of the extra Absheron output to Turkey. Turkish Energy Minister Alparslan Bayraktar announced January 4 that Ankara had agreed a new deal to take 2.25 bcm per year of gas starting in 2029. With Ankara keen to reduce dependence on Russian gas, the deal is good news for Turkey, assuming the planned expansion of the Absheron field goes ahead. 

The lack of information on reserves and future production is matched by a lack of clarity over plans to expand the three pipelines that make up the Southern Gas Corridor. Azerbaijan needs the corridor’s overall volume to expand to facilitate any additional exports to the EU. 

News of the expansion of the TAP pipeline to facilitate an overall export volume of 11.5 bcm per year does offer some limited confirmation of Azerbaijan’s commitment to boost exports to Europe. Still, TAP’s current capacity falls far short of the route’s maximum potential of 20 bcm per year, the same volume Baku promised to Europe back in 2022. 

There is no indication about when or if investments will be forthcoming to expand TAP to its maximum capacity. The same holds true for the TANAP and the South Caucasus Pipeline (SCP). Both routes require new compressor stations, with the SCP also requiring the laying of an additional pipeline, to enable Baku to increase EU-bound annual exports to even 16 bcm.

By Eurasianet

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com

Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Download Oilprice.com on Apple
Download Oilprice.com on Android

Back to homepage

Eurasianet

Eurasianet

Eurasianet is an independent news organization that covers news from and about the South Caucasus and Central Asia, providing on-the-ground reporting and critical perspectives on…

More Info

Related posts

Leave a comment

Read More


Categories
South Caucasus News

Amnesty: Azerbaijan is using sports to launder dirty money


Amnesty: Azerbaijan is using sports to launder dirty money

On New Year’s Eve, during the third stage of the Tour de Ski, all athletes from both the men’s and women’s teams competed wearing uniforms sponsored with the name “Azerbaijan.” The country’s advertising was also prominently displayed in large letters at the center of the stadium track and on the side panels in the finish area.
Tour de Ski is a prestigious, multi-stage international tournament in the cross-country skiing discipline. The World Cup stage of the tournament takes place between December 28 and January 4 in Val di Fiemme, Italy, and traditionally ends with a final uphill climbing stage.
Photo: FIS Cross Country – YouTube Video Screen
A partnership agreement has been signed between the Azerbaijan State Tourism Agency and the International Ski and Snowboard Federation (FIS) under the banner of developing winter tourism and winter sports, and enabling Azerbaijan to host prestigious international winter sports competitions. The contract was signed last May for a period of five years.
The financial value of this agreement has not been disclosed.
Within the framework of this new partnership, it is emphasized that FIS is expanding its activities internationally in cooperation with the Azerbaijan Tourism Board and representing Azerbaijan with the status of “Global Destination Partner.” The State Tourism Agency states that it aims to promote the development and global recognition of winter sports.
Konde Tangberg, political adviser at Amnesty International Norway, says this is an operation of laundering dirty money through sports and using it for political purposes:
“Azerbaijan’s state tourism agency sponsoring ski tournaments is, of course, purely about serving the political interests of those in power,” he said.
Photo: FIS Cross Country – YouTube Video Screen
According to Amnesty International, Azerbaijan has long been criticized for human rights violations. More than 30 journalists are imprisoned in the country, and Amnesty says that independent organizations and media are not allowed to operate there.
“Such agreements, while creating positive associations with a country, normalize and legitimize governments that aggressively suppress human rights and pursue climate-hostile policies,” Tangberg said regarding FIS’s choice of sponsor.
In May, speaking to the press, the president of the Norwegian Ski Federation, Tove Moe Dyrhaug, expressed dissatisfaction with the agreement between FIS and Azerbaijan, stating that it does not align with the values they stand for and emphasizing the need for greater transparency and better governance in international sports.
A Norwegian newspaper contacted FIS, which has been criticized by Amnesty.
In an email response, FIS stated that, among other things, cooperation with the Azerbaijan State Tourism Agency is a “crucial strategic step” for expanding their reach to more parts of the world.
Incidentally, none of the 212 athletes competing in the Tour de Ski—neither women nor men—are from Azerbaijan.
Photo: FIS Cross Country – YouTube Video Screen
On the other hand, one male athlete from Armenia, Mikael Mikaelyan, chose to remove the sponsor’s name from his uniform so that it would not be visible. He was fined for violating the rules.
Azerbaijan has previously used funds obtained from oil revenues to invest in football sponsorships through partnerships with the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA), one of Spain’s biggest clubs Atlético Madrid, and one of Turkey’s largest clubs, Galatasaray. The contract with Atlético Madrid cost €15.5 million, and the one with Galatasaray €15 million.
The country has also been hosting a Formula 1 World Championship race for several years.

The post Amnesty: Azerbaijan is using sports to launder dirty money appeared first on MEYDAN.TV.


Categories
South Caucasus News

Новый опасный вирус



Categories
South Caucasus News

Иран готовится к удару со стороны США. Турция создает буферную зону на границе



Categories
South Caucasus News

“Zootopia 2” tops Hollywood box office in China


The animated film “Zootopia 2” has earned $632 million in China, setting a new record for Hollywood films in the country, Azernews reports.