Categories
South Caucasus News

U.S. lawmakers introduce bipartisan resolution condemning Azerbaijan’s ethnic cleansing of Artsakh



Categories
South Caucasus News

Правящая «Мечта» голосует за запрет «пропаганды ЛГБТ», Венецианская комиссия вносит поправки


Парламент Грузии принял в первом чтении законопроект о запрете «пропаганды ЛГБТ». Документ поддержали 78 парламентариев, представляющих большинство в парламенте, а оппозиция бойкотировала голосование. Второе и третье чтения состоятся осенью 2024 года. Рассматриваемый законопроект предусматривает запрет на миграцию трансгендеров, усыновление детей однополыми парами и распространение информации, связанной с ЛГБТК+. Венецианская комиссия выразила сожаление, что законодательная инициатива, […]

Categories
South Caucasus News

Human Right Groups Slam Sweden Over Enabling Tehran’s ‘Hostage-Taking’ – ایران اینترنشنال


Human Right Groups Slam Sweden Over Enabling Tehran’s ‘Hostage-Taking’  ایران اینترنشنال

Categories
South Caucasus News

STAR Refinery increases crude oil imports by 2%


The STAR Refinery, an asset of the State Oil Company of Azerbaijan Republic (SOCAR) in Türkiye, imported 863,654 tons of crude oil in April of 2024, Report informs, referring to the Turkish Energy Market Regulatory Authority (EMRA).

Categories
South Caucasus News

Aydın Karimov: About 13,000 tourists visited Shusha during recent holidays


About 13,000 tourists visited Shusha for 4-5 days on the eve of the National Salvation Day and the Eid al-Adha, said Aydin Karimov, the special representative of the President of Azerbaijan in Shusha, at the event “New Opportunities for Entrepreneurs: Let

Categories
South Caucasus News

FATF maintains Russia’s suspended membership status


The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) has maintained its suspension of Russia’s membership following its plenary week in Singapore.

Categories
(@mikenov) / Twitter

@mikenov: “The 90-minute debate was a dispiriting race to the bottom, pitting a tongue-tied octogenarian against a pathological liar. Undecided voters looking for a positive reason to vote for one or the other were unlikely to find enlightenment.” – Column: Who won the Biden-Trump debate?…



Categories
Selected Articles

Nobody won that debate, but Biden lost ground


?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcalifornia-times-brig

WASHINGTON — 

When two flawed presidential candidates, President Biden and former President Trump, met in their high-stakes debate Thursday night, each hoped to pass a test in voters’ eyes. Both failed — but Biden’s stumbles, fairly or not, are likely to cost him more than Trump’s.

Biden needed to quell concerns that he’s too old to serve effectively for another four years. His stumbling, occasionally incoherent performance fell far short. He looked every one of his 81 years — markedly less vigorous and crisp than the commanding figure who delivered an effective State of the Union address about four months ago.

Trump, who is 78, needed to look and sound presidential to appeal to voters who doubt his temperament and his stability. He needed to avoid his self-indulgent temptation to claim that every election he loses was rigged and every legal setback he suffers was politically motivated. He failed, too.

The 90-minute debate was a dispiriting race to the bottom, pitting a tongue-tied octogenarian against a pathological liar. Undecided voters looking for a positive reason to vote for one or the other were unlikely to find enlightenment.

But that doesn’t mean it was a tie. If it had been a boxing match — an apt analogy, given its flurries of verbal punches — a referee would probably have awarded Trump a win on points, for two reasons.

First, Biden came into the debate as the candidate who needed to shake up the campaign. Trump has led recent national polls by a hair, but he is clearly ahead in most of the half-dozen battleground states that will decide the election. Biden hoped to change that, so he needed a win.

Second, while Trump missed an opportunity to appeal to undecided voters and expand his support, he did a more effective job than Biden of presenting his favorite talking points. Many of them were untrue and some were nonsensical, but most went unrebutted by either Biden or CNN’s moderators, who had sworn off fact checking for the evening. That left Trump no worse off than when he started.

A debate’s impact often comes down to a few memorable moments. Many voters didn’t watch at all, and some who tuned in didn’t stay for all 90 minutes. But over the next week or two, some of their worst moments will be played and replayed, magnifying their effect.

A few examples of each candidate’s worst moments may convey the flavor of the evening. (A list of their best moments would be sparse.)

Biden’s voice was hoarse and halting, especially early in the debate. He appeared to lose his train of thought more than once; his voice trailed off at the end of several answers. He ended one tangled explanation of his tax proposals with the puzzling phrase: “if we finally beat Medicare.” After another such moment, Trump seized the opportunity to make sure viewers noticed, saying: “I really don’t know what he said at the end of that sentence. I don’t think he knows what he said, either.”

Trump lied with his customary enthusiasm, reeling off bogus claims he has honed in dozens of stump speeches. He said he produced “the greatest economy in the history of our country” during his term as president, but that isn’t true under any definition of economic success. He claimed Democratic states are routinely killing infants “after birth,” a luridly inaccurate description of late-term abortion. He claimed Biden’s immigration policies have allowed “18, 19, could be 20 million” undocumented migrants into the country, a wild exaggeration, and that the Biden administration is “putting them on Social Security and Medicare.” (It isn’t.)

All those whoppers are familiar to anyone who has sat through any of Trump’s rallies; all have been debunked. But there were too many for Biden to knock down one at a time, so he responded: “Everything he just said was a lie.”

And Trump ducked any question he didn’t want to answer — including whether he will abide by the result of the election. “If it’s a fair and legal and good election, absolutely,” he said — but instantly undercut that semi-pledge by claiming that the 2020 election was riddled with fraud. (It wasn’t.)

There are vast differences between these two candidates on important issues before the country, and voters deserved a debate that illuminated their choice. This was not that debate.

Instead, it was a missed opportunity for both candidates — and one that not only damaged Biden’s chances of shaking Trump’s lead, but was certain to reopen the barely suppressed debate among Democrats over whether they have their best possible nominee.

With four months remaining before election day, the race undoubtedly has more twists and turns to come. But Thursday’s debate was surely a pivotal moment — a setback for Biden that he must now try to repair.

Read more from columnist Doyle McManus on Trump and California:


Categories
South Caucasus News

CSTO and Azerbaijan. Is the CSTO attractive? – JAMnews


CSTO and Azerbaijan. Is the CSTO attractive?  JAMnews

Categories
South Caucasus News

Is the CSTO attractive to Azerbaijan? A view from Baku


CSTO and Azerbaijan

On June 24th, the Secretary General of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), Imangali Tasmagambetov, stated that the functionality and membership of the organization could be expanded. According to him, there is a significant need for a military-political union, which is natural and historically justified. “Moreover, the CSTO offers very favorable terms for participation,” Tasmagambetov added.

Russia plays a leading role within the CSTO, which also includes Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Armenia. However, recently, Armenian prime minister Nikol Pashinyan has sharply criticized the CSTO’s activities, suggesting that Armenia’s participation in the organization is de facto frozen.

Meanwhile, there is an opinion that Azerbaijan could potentially join this organization. However, Azerbaijani officials have stated several times that there is no need for their country to join the CSTO.



Member of Parliament: “The question of Azerbaijan’s membership in the CSTO is not relevant”

Hikmet Babaoglu. CSTO and AzerbaijanHikmet Babaoglu

In current realities, Azerbaijan has the strength and capability to independently establish a new security framework, stated Hikmet Babaoglu, Deputy Chairman of the Defense, Security, and Anti-Corruption Committee of the Milli Majlis (Parliament), to Turan News Agency:

“There is no doubt that Azerbaijan is becoming one of the centers capable of forming a new security umbrella. At the recent international conference in Shusha, president Ilham Aliyev addressed this issue, stating that Azerbaijan could become one of the new centers of power in the international relations system alongside the Turkic Council.

A center of power encompasses not only economic, political, and diplomatic influence but also military strength. Therefore, the question of Azerbaijan’s membership in the CSTO is not relevant.

According to the deputy, if events in the new world order develop rapidly in the future, entirely different realities could emerge within two years:

This depends on the outcomes of the conflict in Eastern Europe. There may arise a situation where the Turkic Council could create a security umbrella for itself in these processes or form a collective security organization.

Political analyst: “A drowning man wants to drag his comrades down with him”

Elkhan Shahinoglu. CSTO and AzerbaijanElkhan Shahinoglu

Recently, at a meeting of the CSTO foreign ministers in Almaty, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov proposed a new security architecture in Eurasia, as recalled by Elkhan Shahinoglu, the head of the “Atlas” Research Center, in an interview with Radio Liberty:

Russia is waging war in Ukraine and wants to strengthen its military bloc because its relations with many countries are strained. This proposal represents a new security architecture in Eurasia. There are two possibilities: either the expansion of the CSTO is implied, or it refers to a new military bloc.

According to the expert, efforts are being made in this direction:

Russia wants this. Russian authorities want Azerbaijan to participate in the new security architecture of Eurasia alongside Central Asian countries. Russia is isolated, and as they say, a drowning man wants to drag others down with him. However, no country will agree to this because no one wants to spoil relations with the West because of Russia.”

Shahinoglu believes that joining the CSTO contradicts Azerbaijan’s national interests and security interests:

On an official level, Azerbaijan does not join military blocs. That’s why we became a member of the Non-Aligned Movement, to avoid joining NATO or the CSTO. I don’t believe that the Azerbaijani government will give a positive response to the proposal for CSTO membership.