Categories
South Caucasus News

Robert Reich: Trump Vs Biden (How Worried Should We Be?) – OpEd


Robert Reich: Trump Vs Biden (How Worried Should We Be?) – OpEd

You’re probably as stunned as I am to learn that Biden is now trailing Trump by 4 to 10 points among registered voters in the key battleground states of Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, and Pennsylvania, according to new polls by The New York Times and Siena College.

I want to use today’s letter to reassure you.

First, as I’ve noted before, polls a year before an election are not predictive of outcomes.

Yes, these latest polls are disturbing. I’m appalled that majorities in five key swing states are for Trump. What planet have they been living on? What planet have I been living on? How can it be that majorities in five pivotal states are willing to vote for a person who staged an attempted coup against the United States and is now being tried for four separate state or federal crimes, not to mention civil fraud?

Voters say they trust Trump over President Biden on the economy and foreign policy. But these voters obviously haven’t been paying attention. A year before an election, most voters are not paying attention.

Even before the pandemic — made worse by Trump’s rejection of basic public health protocols — the economy was creating far fewer jobs than it has under Biden’s watch, and the median wage was lower. On foreign policy, Trump coddled Putin, emboldening him to attack Ukraine, and supported anti-democracy movements in Europe.

As I noted recently, Biden is the only adult in the room. He is also the most progressive, labor-friendly president we’ve had since Franklin D. Roosevelt. His legislative record would be judged successful even if he hadn’t had a razor-thin majority in his first two years against the most hostile Republicans in memory.

Many voters don’t see this because Biden doesn’t communicate in ways that today’s media — and many of today’s voters — are able to process. His communications are straightforward. They minimize emotional turbulence. He exudes calm determination. 

By contrast, everything Trump says and posts is designed to spur a large emotional reaction. His ridicule, anger, and vindictiveness are intended to elicit immediate, passionate responses.

Trump gives the impression of strength because of the strength of his bile.

When voters tell pollsters they think Trump is “stronger” than Biden on the economy or foreign policy, they’re responding to emotions associated with strength that Trump stirs up — rage, ferocity, vindictiveness, and anger.

On the economy, many voters continue to feel overwhelmed. Because of the Fed’s high interest rates, most people face high finance charges on cars, mortgages, anything they buy on credit. So Trump’s bile may feel more appropriate than Biden’s tame discussion of economic data.

On foreign policy, many if not most Americans feel anger, fear, betrayal, impatience. Trump’s rage more closely matches those feelings than Biden’s measured diplomacy.

The issue of Biden’s age has become a proxy for all this. Only three years separates Trump from Biden. Trump is evidently more out of shape than Biden. And if you watch and listen to Trump you’ll find signs of mental deterioration. (His testimony yesterday in the civil fraud lawsuit against him drifted from incoherent rant to rambling digression.)

But Trump’s bile gives him a patina of vigor. His anger appears to shows vitality. His vindictiveness makes him seem forceful. We live in an angry time. It is easy for the public to confuse anger with strength.  

Biden projects strength the old-fashioned way — through mature and responsible leadership. But mature and responsible leadership doesn’t cut through the media and reach today’s public. 

At least not now. But elections have a way of concentrating the public’s mind. As the 2024 contest draws closer, more Americans will decide they prefer competence to chaos. 

I expect more panic among Democrats, who will suggest that Biden pull out of the race and make way for a more “attractive” Democratic candidate. 

Rubbish. The reality is that Biden is the only person who has beaten Trump. Biden is the incumbent president with all the advantages of incumbency. Biden has shown himself to be a strong campaigner. There is no one to take his place.

If Biden simply continues to be the adult in the room — governing maturely and responsibly — more of the American public will eventually come around to him, including in the swing states. And the more they see that Trump is increasingly unhinged, they will decide that they’d rather have a competent adult in charge.

So my advice is not to panic, not to unduly worry. Biden will need to work hard for it, and the rest of us will have to work hard in support of him, but Biden will win in 2024.

This article was published at Robert Reich’s Substack


Categories
South Caucasus News

Australia and India’s New Military Bases: Responses To China’s Naval Presence In The Indian Ocean – Analysis


Australia and India’s New Military Bases: Responses To China’s Naval Presence In The Indian Ocean – Analysis

By Felix K. Chang 

(FPRI) — In May 2022, a Chinese navy Type 815 electronic surveillance ship, the Haiwangxing, sailed close to the Harold E. Holt naval communication station in western Australia, a facility jointly operated by Australia and the United States. On the edge of the Indian Ocean, the station provides communications support to allied submarines operating in the region. The ship’s presence showed China’s willingness to not only eavesdrop on allied communications, but also send its navy into parts of the Indian Ocean where it had rarely ventured before. That prompted concerns in Canberra that were reminiscent of those in New Delhi after a Chinese Song-class diesel-electric attack submarine unexpectedly docked at a Sri Lankan port in 2014. In the following years, several Chinese hydrographic and survey ships appeared in the region, presaging the future deployment of more Chinese submarines.

Such incidents served as reminders to Australia and India of their need to be prepared for China’s growing maritime presence in the Indian Ocean. Already, that awareness has led both countries to support automatic identification system transponder signals collection to more carefully monitor the movements of Chinese vessels. For now, Australia and India, along with Japan and the United States, have used the collected data to highlight China’s illegal fishing practices. Some suggest that the countries could one day use the data collection infrastructure to track Chinese coast-guard and navy ships too. 

But doing so has drawbacks. Chinese surface combatants could disable or spoof their transponder signals. Moreover, Chinese submarines, stealthy by nature, do not emit any signals when submerged. Thus, Australia and India have sought other ways to monitor the waters of the Indian Ocean for Chinese warships and, more specifically, to monitor the passages into the ocean through the Indonesian archipelago, namely the Malacca, Lombok, and Sunda Straits. That has required the two countries to devote resources to build new military bases and deploy new military assets on a variety of Indian Ocean islands.

China Challenge

China’s interest in the Indian Ocean is hardly new. Chinese strategists have commented on the ocean’s importance to their country’s expanding commercial interests and as a conduit for its energy and raw material needs. China’s interest became tangible after it opened its first overseas military base in Djibouti on the western edge of the Indian Ocean. At first glance, the base seemed isolated, given that China’s next closest naval base is thousands of kilometers away. However, fortunately for China, its companies built and, in many cases, now manage civilian ports throughout the region. India, for instance, has long been worried that China could use the ports to facilitate its navy’s operations in the Indian Ocean. Among the ports most often mentioned are Chittagong in Bangladesh, Gwadar in Pakistan, Hambantota in Sri Lanka, and Kyaukpyu in Myanmar.

Perhaps even more worrisome to Indian strategists is China’s sprawling Yulin naval base at Yalong Bay on Hainan Island. Though located in China itself and primarily built for the country’s nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarine fleet, the base can handle all sorts of warships, including aircraft carriers and nuclear-powered attack submarines. Unlike the Song-class diesel-electric attack submarine that visited Sri Lanka, the naval base’s six Shang-class nuclear-powered attack submarines can sail into the Indian Ocean without surfacing or needing an accompanying submarine tender, which often gives away the passage of submarines.

Nevertheless, all Chinese warships, including its Shang-class submarines, must pass through the Malacca, Lombok, or Sunda Straits to reach the Indian Ocean. (To be sure, the deeper Lombok Strait is easier for submarines to transit submerged than either the Malacca or Sunda Straits.) However, if Australia and India hope to check China’s naval presence, they must be able to monitor all three of the straits, both above and below the water’s surface—a capability that neither could do without additional bases and forces in the Indian Ocean.

India Bolsters Island Strongholds

Given India’s enduring concern over a possible conflict with China, New Delhi has long been worried about Chinese warships in the Indian Ocean. To address that concern in the diplomatic arena, it has pursued its “Look East” strategy, promoting stronger ties with Indonesia, the Philippines, and Vietnam, countries that dominate the routes through which Chinese warships would have to pass to reach the Indian Ocean. Meanwhile, in the military sphere, India has sought to build new or expand existing bases in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands.

At the time of the Song-class submarine incident, India had only four Soviet-vintage, prop-driven Tu-142M maritime patrol aircraft to cover the entire eastern Indian Ocean. They operated from Rajali naval air station on India’s eastern coast. Since then, India has purchased twelve American-made P-8I maritime patrol aircraft, the sale of which the United States encouraged as a way to deepen its security ties with India. The P-8Is offer not only superior surveillance and reconnaissance capabilities, but also greater speed and longer endurance, making them better anti-submarine warfare platforms. India also established the Baaz naval air station on Great Nicobar Island at the southern end of the Nicobar Islands, only 450 km from the Malacca Strait. From the start, India intended to extend the station’s 3,500-foot runway to accommodate the P-8Is. While the runway was lengthened by 800 feet by 2022, environmental concerns have slowed further construction.

In 2019, India established the Kohassa naval air station on North Andaman Island at the northern end of the Andaman Islands, near a suspected Chinese intelligence outpost on Myanmar’s Coco Island. Again, India has plans to extend the station’s runway to accommodate P-8Is. At the time of writing, only the Utkrosh naval air station in the Nicobar and Andaman Islands has a runway long enough to service the new aircraft. That station is currently home to a squadron of short-range Do-228 maritime patrol aircraft.

More broadly, in 2019, India announced a ten-year infrastructure upgrade program to deploy new aircraft, warships, and anti-ship missile batteries throughout the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Some elements have now been deployed. The Indian navy rebased a Kora-class guided-missile corvette to Port Blair, and the Indian air force established a forward base for its Su-30MKI fighters on Car Nicobar. Plus, the Indian army has test fired its Brahmos anti-ship missiles from the islands. Meanwhile, New Delhi has built a new base on Mauritius’ Agaléga Island, from which it is likely to operate its P-8I maritime patrol aircraft.

Australia Expands Strategic Ports

Further east, Australia has also begun to construct military facilities in and around the Indian Ocean. That has been driven by the perception that China has grown more menacing. The increasing appearance of Chinese naval vessels off Australia’s coasts since the 2010s, China’s diplomatic and trade spats with Australia in the early 2020s, and Beijing’s rising political sway over Australia’s neighbors in Oceania have led Canberra to reconsider what it needs to defend its interests, including those in the Indian Ocean, which include several islands and some of Australia’s biggest offshore energy reserves.

So far, Canberra has concentrated its efforts on the Cocos (Keeling) Islands, which has a harbor better for handling heavy equipment than Australia’s other Indian Ocean possession, Christmas Island. The Cocos Islands’ location, about 1,200 km southeast of the Sunda and Lombok Straits and 2,700 km northwest of Perth, make them strategic. As a result, during the 1990s, Australia periodically flew P-3C maritime patrol aircraft from the islands. The United States even briefly considered them as an alternative to Diego Garcia in 2012, when it feared that its lease on the island may end in 2036.

Given the increased presence of Chinese warships off Australia’s coasts, Canberra announced that it would upgrade the Cocos Islands’ airport to support the Australian air force P-8As in 2016. Work at the airport, however, has been slow due to rising costs. Nevertheless, Australia appears committed to complete the construction as the islands were specifically mentioned in its 2023 Defense Strategic Review. The airport will also act as a forward operating base for Australia’s four new MC-55A surveillance and electronic warfare aircraft.

But Canberra’s most ambitious base-building plan, approved earlier this year, calls for an expansion of its Stirling naval base near Perth. Australia intends for the base to become the home port for as many as eight new conventionally-armed, nuclear-powered attack submarines, which it announced that it would acquire as part of its AUKUS security partnership with the United Kingdom and United States in 2021. Work will first start on repurposing some of the base’s current facilities before moving onto constructing new ones that will be needed to support nuclear-power plants. In the meantime, American and British submarines are expected to make more frequent port calls at Stirling. The most recent was a US Virginia-class nuclear-powered attack submarine, the North Carolina, in August 2023. Similar future Australian submarines based at Stirling would able to reach the Lombok Strait in 2.2 days at an average speed of 30 knots and remain on station for months. By comparison, Australia’s current fleet of six Collins-class diesel-electric attack submarines would require 6.6 days (at snorting depth) to cover that distance and have enough fuel for only a week-long patrol.

Self-Interested Sharing

The separate investments that Australia and India have made and continue to make into the construction of military bases in and around the Indian Ocean have been driven by their concerns over China’s maritime presence in the region. The similarity of those concerns give Canberra and New Delhi an incentive to share the information that they each collect on Chinese naval vessels near Indonesia’s three strategic straits and in the wider Indian Ocean. The combination of that information with data the two countries already share about Chinese vessels as part of their participation in the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (or “Quad”) could provide Australia and India with an even sharper picture of Chinese maritime activity across the Indian Ocean. Such collaboration would be simultaneously self-interested and mutually beneficial.

Going a bit further, some in Washington might hope that such fused data could be shared with the United States, another Quad member. That could be a step too far, at least in the short term. While Canberra might be open to intelligence sharing with Washington given its participation in Five Eyes intelligence alliance—which includes Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States—India is less likely to be keen. After all, the reason for India’s more active participation in the Quad was never to cozy up to America. Thus, were the subject to be broached, India would probably be more responsive if the request came from Australia, a country with which it has common cause. In this case, Washington should follow Canberra’s lead.


The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Foreign Policy Research Institute, a non-partisan organization that seeks to publish well-argued, policy-oriented articles on American foreign policy and national security priorities.

About the author: Felix K. Chang is a senior fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute and the Chief Operating Officer of DecisionQ, an artificial intelligence engineering company.

Source: This article was published by FPRI


Categories
South Caucasus News

Stop Mandatory Time Changes – OpEd


Stop Mandatory Time Changes – OpEd

Hundreds of millions of Americans suffer the effects of being forced to move the hands of their clocks back or forth by an hour every year. Daylight saving time ended in the wee hours of Sunday, November 6, except for the residents of Arizona, Hawaii, and the outlying U.S. territories, where people avoid the hassle by remaining on standard time year-round.

The return to standard time (until early March 2024, a mere four months from now) will reset our body clocks (circadian rhythms) to their proper places. As physiological research teaches, body clocks and sleep cycles primarily are regulated by—and adjust to—light and darkness. Standard time helps synchronize body clocks with the sun’s clock.

When it is in effect, daylight saving time disrupts that synchronization. It essentially forces people to move temporarily one time zone to the East; it produces what sometimes is called “social jet lag.” Although our circadian rhythms eventually adapt, abrupt transitions to DST and then back again cause productivity losses in the workplace owing to disturbed sleep cycles. Spikes in heart attacks and strokes, more automobile accidents, more visits to the emergency room, and other untoward effects on health and safety in the short run are well-documented in the relevant literature. Much less is known about the long-run consequences of mandatory twice-yearly time-shifting.

Daylight saving time is misnamed. Absolutely nothing is saved when clocks are moved forward an hour in March. (Or, if so, an hour is “lost” in the spring to “save” one in autumn.) The number of hours of sunlight per day is determined not by timepieces, but by a location’s latitude (distance from the equator) and season of the year.

DST apparently is politically popular. Back in 2023 the U.S. Senate passed by voice vote a bill (the “Sunshine Protection Act”) that would make DST permanent, canceling November 2023’s scheduled return to standard time, thereby keeping clocks one hour ahead year-around nationwide from then on. Although the measure later died in the House of Representatives, bipartisan support for DST from undoubtedly groggy, sleep-deprived senators indicates that many voters are unhappy with the annual ritual of “springing forward” and “falling back.”

I, too, hate being compelled to shift back and forth timewise. Health and economic considerations mean that establishing DST year-round is the wrong choice, something that is painfully obvious to early morning commuters and to parents forced to send their children off to school in the pitch black this time of year. Current federal law (the Uniform Time Act of 1966) allows individual states to opt out of DST and observe standard time all 12 months of the year, but adopting daylight saving time permanently requires congressional approval.

If it had passed, the Sunshine Protection Act would, of course, have forced Arizonans and Hawaiians to toe the DST line, imposing on those states a top-down policy change that certainly would disrupt established custom and might be deeply unpopular. 

Shifting sunlight to day’s end probably generates more sales revenue for retailers, the owners of golf courses, and other outdoor venues, especially businesses catering to tourists. One therefore can anticipate opposition to permanent standard time. Whatever harm is done to the special interests by canceling DST forever, though, promises to be more than offset by improved bodily well-being for the rest of us. 

This article was adapted from Stop the Madness of Mandatory Time Changes!: Why are we resetting our clocks?, originally appearing on The Beacon


Categories
South Caucasus News

Solving The Mystery Of Sudden Deaths In Young Adults – Analysis


Solving The Mystery Of Sudden Deaths In Young Adults – Analysis

By Dr. Rajeev Jayadevan

Since the onset of the pandemic, there has been considerable public interest and anxiety regarding sudden deaths in relatively young adults. Some individuals have speculated that this is a recent phenomenon and have even linked it to the COVID-19 vaccination.

Given the novelty of COVID-19 and its vaccines, these theories have gained traction. This article provides clarity on the matter, summarising relevant scientific literature prior to the pandemic and discussing the latest research by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) from a public health perspective.

Why are young adults dying suddenly?

While it is true that deaths occur more commonly among older people, it must be kept in mind that healthy young people can also die suddenly. In such instances, the true cause of death is only revealed by autopsy studies. In the past, such studies have been conducted on young adults who died suddenly without prior warning or obvious cause.

These studies found that sudden deaths among the youngest adults occur from multiple causes—surprisingly, not all are heart-related. About 5-10 percent remain unexplained even after autopsy; these are frequently attributed to abnormal heart rhythms (arrhythmias). Other causes in the Indian context include infections, stroke, and gastrointestinal and respiratory illnesses. This was revealed in a 2011 autopsy study that specifically looked at sudden deaths among people in India between the ages of 18-35 years. However, among older age groups, a greater proportion of sudden deaths are due to heart-related causes. A 2002 autopsy study published in India, which examined the cause of sudden death occurring between the ages of 23-50, showed that 77 percent were due to coronary heart disease; other causes being aortoarteritis, cardiomyopathy, and stroke.

What are the chances of a heart attack among young adults in India?

Half of the heart attacks among South Asians occur below the age of 52 years. This is partly because, unlike Western countries, the population of India is relatively youngwith an average (median) age of only 28. This means that half the population of India is below 28, which translates to a very large number of young individuals.

landmark paper published in 2011 observed death patterns in several villages in Kerala over five years. After analysing 4,271 deaths in a population of 1,61,942 people, the authors found that among younger adults of age 35-44 years, the yearly odds of dying from coronary artery disease was 59 per 100,000 persons among men, and 17 per 100,000 among women. This amounts to a death risk of 1:1,700 every year among men in that age group. When applied to a large population, the total number of deaths can be considerable, especially as traditional coronary risk factors are common in the subcontinent. This risk increases with advancing age.

Implication of COVID vaccination

Over the years, it has become clear that COVID-19 is not just a respiratory illness or a common cold, and can affect the inner lining of blood vessels. In the early phase of the pandemic, deaths from COVID-19 occurred as a result of pneumonia, lung clots, heart disease, myocarditis, sepsis, kidney failure, and stroke.

recent study by ICMR observed the course of 14,419 people who were discharged from hospitals across India after surviving COVID-19. The study found a remarkably high death rate of 6.5 percent over a year. Specific risk factors included age-specific reasons and pre-existing medical conditions. The main causes of these delayed deaths were heart and lung disease. The study reported that people who were vaccinated were less likely to die over the subsequent one-year period when compared to those who were unvaccinated.

What did the latest ICMR study on sudden deaths show?

Another study from ICMR looked at 729 individuals between the age of 18-45 who died suddenly despite being in  “good health”. Deaths that occurred between 1 October 2021 and 31 March 2023 were studied, which basically included the tail end of the Delta period—a period marked by the prevalence of the Delta variant of COVID-19—transitioning into the Omicron era. Unlike the previous ICMR study, this research did not selectively look at people who had COVID-19, the task being specifically to study sudden deaths.

The 729 people who died were compared with 2,916 controls of comparable age, gender, and locality. The aim was to find out if there were specific risk factors among those who died suddenly, compared to other people within the same demographic group. Risk factors identified were smoking, binge drinking, and intense physical activity shortly before death. In addition, those who had been hospitalised from COVID-19, people who had a history of sudden death within the family, and unvaccinated individuals were also more likely to suffer a sudden death.

The study states that vaccination did not increase the risk of sudden death. On the contrary, the authors report that vaccination reduced the risk of sudden death among adults.

What does all this mean?

The study disproves commonly-heard allegations that young people are dying as a result of COVID-19 vaccination. Such assertions are frequently forwarded on social media and tend to recirculate every time a prominent person passes away suddenly, regardless of the cause.

The study also reconfirms what was already known about heart attacks among younger adults in developing countries: Tobacco and alcohol use are recognised risk factors. This was originally shown in the INTERHEART study published in The Lancet.

How to reduce the risk of sudden death among young people?

  1. Avoid tobacco use and binge drinking of alcohol.
  2. If there are symptoms of chest pain or shortness of breath, consult a doctor to determine the cause, and proceed accordingly.
  3. Regular exercise along with a balanced diet and active lifestyle promotes long-term health.
  4. Those with a family history of heart disease occurring at a young age might need additional tests, and must check with their doctor.
  5. Control of modifiable risk factors such as obesity, blood sugar, BP and LDL cholesterol level will reduce the overall risk of heart attacks.
  6. The latest ICMR study shows there is no need to worry that being vaccinated increases the risk of sudden death. On the other hand, COVID-19 on its own increases the risk of multiple health problems in the future. These include Long COVID—having multiple lingering symptoms that can last for weeks or months after infection—as well as increased mortality, particularly among those who require hospitalisation. Therefore, strategies to reduce the risk of COVID-19 will help.

Is exercise after COVID-19 dangerous?

In this context, it is important to distinguish between routine activity, regular exercise, and strenuous exercise. Routine activity includes casual walking and doing household chores. Regular exercise comprises brisk walking, light jogging, and swimming. Examples of strenuous exercise include running a half-marathon or doing intense workouts such as lifting heavy weights in the gymnasium.

While routine activity can be resumed early in most people who had a recent bout of COVID-19, they must be relatively cautious about resuming exercise. If the person is in good health, COVID-19 is mild, and there are no residual symptoms, regular exercise can be restarted after 7-14 days. It is best to start slow, and gradually increase over a period of weeks, carefully observing the body’s response. Exercise is a long-term investment, and a brief interruption will not affect health. Therefore, it is prudent to take a gentle and nuanced approach in this regard.

On the other hand, people with underlying health conditions, those who experience symptoms, and individuals who wish to engage in strenuous exercise after COVID-19 must check with their doctor.

The latest ICMR study has identified intense physical activity and severe COVID-19 as risk factors for sudden death in young adults. Therefore, individuals who had a severe bout of COVID-19 are advised to be more cautious while exercising. They must be particularly wary of strenuous or unaccustomed exercise. It is wise to check with one’s doctor about doing this safely.


About the author: Dr Rajeev Jayadevan is the former president of the Cochin Branch of the Indian Medical Association and Co Chairman of the National IMA COVID Task Force

Source: This article was published by the Observer Research Foundation


Categories
South Caucasus News

Armenia’s MFA responds to Azerbaijani MFA’s statement about – NEWS.am


Armenia’s MFA responds to Azerbaijani MFA’s statement about  NEWS.am

Categories
South Caucasus News

Karabakh Armenian Vagif Khachatryan Sentenced to 15 Years After a Sham Azerbaijani Trial – Armenian News by MassisPost


Karabakh Armenian Vagif Khachatryan Sentenced to 15 Years After a Sham Azerbaijani Trial  Armenian News by MassisPost

Categories
South Caucasus News

Lt. governor unveils plan to make Georgia professional licenses … – Georgia Recorder


Lt. governor unveils plan to make Georgia professional licenses …  Georgia Recorder

Categories
South Caucasus News

AP Headline News – Nov 07 2023 22:00 (EST)


28013281


Categories
South Caucasus News

Russian troops shoot and kill a Georgian civilian near the … – Middletown Press


Russian troops shoot and kill a Georgian civilian near the …  Middletown Press

Categories
South Caucasus News

‘No Choice But To Attack’: Trump’s Iran Claim Viral | Qasem Soleimani Episode – Hindustan Times


‘No Choice But To Attack’: Trump’s Iran Claim Viral | Qasem Soleimani Episode  Hindustan Times